Re: 64bit CPUs
From: João Carlos Mendes Luís (jonny_at_jonny.eng.br)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: Joseph Koshy: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Next in thread: Mariusz Grad: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 02:16:58 -0300 To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 1 May 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> A somewhat obvious question to some perhaps, but what server
>> application mix on FreeBSD today sees an improvement using 64bit CPUs
>> ? In my ISP centric world, my big apps are BIND, IMAP/POP3, httpd via
>> apache, SMTP, AV and SPAM scanning, and firewalls/routing. Apart from
>> larger RAM, why would these benefit from the 64bit world ? Or would
>> they ?
>
> RAM/address space is the big reason. In fact, applications compiled for
> 64-bits may well run slower than 32-bit ones running on the 64-bit
> kernel. Note that systems like Solaris default build many programs as
> 32-bit, since there's no benefit to running ls(1) with a 64-bit address
> space.
Should I understand from this that, in the long term, FreeBSD will
take the same path as Solaris, and have a dual (32bit/64bit) userland on
amd64 arch?
Jonny
-- João Carlos Mendes Luís - Networking Engineer - jonny@jonny.eng.br _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Joseph Koshy: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Next in thread: Mariusz Grad: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|