Re: 64bit CPUs

From: Mariusz Grad (mariusz.grad_at_pwr.wroc.pl)
Date: 05/02/05

  • Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
    Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 14:16:33 +0200
    To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
    
    

    Mike Tancsa:
    > A somewhat obvious question to some perhaps, but what server application
    > mix on FreeBSD today sees an improvement using 64bit CPUs ? In my ISP
    > centric world, my big apps are BIND, IMAP/POP3, httpd via apache, SMTP, AV
    > and SPAM scanning, and firewalls/routing. Apart from larger RAM, why would
    > these benefit from the 64bit world ? Or would they ?
    Benefits from AMD64:
    - larger RAM limit (40bit memory address),
    - 64bit GRPs,
    - much faster access to memory (memory controller inside core - no northbridge),
    - it much better scales (with many CPUs) (he doesnt share memory bandwith),
    - large caches L1 = 64KB, L2 = 1MB (comparing to xeon 12/512K),
    - DEP = Data Execution Protection (it has to be supported via OS),
    - Multimedia Extensions for graphics / vector processing.
    = Opterons remove memory bottlenecks espacially with multi-cpus.

    Ive had large acceleration at:
    - math computation (f77, 2-4GB double precision matrix) single opteron 1.8GHz (sun v20z) was 4x faster then celeron 2.4GHz.
    - databases (pgsql) Opteron 1.8 GHz 2x faster then Xeon 3.2

    I would assume that everything which can run:
    - in parallel,
    - on multi-Opterons CPU,
    - which uses heavly RAM,
    - which can take benefits from 64bit registers (floating points),
    will have _extreamly_ boost comparing to Intels EMT64 (or Itanium2).

    -- 
    Mariusz Grad / UNIX Systems Administrator
    tel: +4871 320-2520 mobile: +48 501-134-008
    Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing 
    address: Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, Wroclaw, Poland
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Random Restarts - Please Help
      ... I upgraded my BIOS a long time ago ... Beginners Guides: Diagnosing Bad Memory ... How to diagnose bad RAM ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
    • Re: Alocated Memory Error (SQLSERVR)
      ... but my understanding is that the MSDE instances are designed to ... and you don't want it grabbing all that RAM. ... running but non ever going about 200mb of memory usage. ... Server 2000 SP4, ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: help
      ... choices and found the RAM memory test option and ran it, ... second later that the DIMM RAM chip showed error after error. ... I would bet that the fan ... > inspection, and swapped suspected parts around, and got no boot ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: How to set up a Linux machine that occupies the minimum memory footprint ?
      ... Of course, if you use 8GB of RAM, or more precisely if you ... Are you saying that if I have a 4GB RAM memory, ... Linux will somehow "know" that it doesn't have ... You've said in another message that your app is ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)
    • Re: How to set up a Linux machine that occupies the minimum memory footprint ?
      ... Of course, if you use 8GB of RAM, or more precisely if you ... Are you saying that if I have a 4GB RAM memory, ... Linux will somehow "know" that it doesn't have ... You've said in another message that your app is ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)