Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x

From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 05/02/05

  • Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
    To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
    Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 15:15:06 +0200
    
    

    In message <427626DC.5030702@centtech.com>, Eric Anderson writes:

    >Don't mean to be terse here, but I'm talking about the same test done an
    >two different RAID5 configurations, with different disks, and not just
    >me - other users in this very thread see the same issue..

    Uhm, if you are using RAID5 and your requests are not aligned and
    sized after the RAID5 you should *expect* read performance to be poor.

    If you your request ends up accessing two different blocks even just
    once per stripe, this totally kills performance.

    -- 
    Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
    phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
    FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
    Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"

    Relevant Pages

    • geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD?
      ... Right now there's gvinum with RAID5 support and geom_raid3. ... The latter is nice but only works with a 'strange' number of disks and has the disadvantages associated with RAID3, while gvinum offers poor RAID5 write performance. ... geom_raid5, on the other hand, offers excellent performance due to write combining, that allows 2-phase requests to be converted into 1-phase requests. ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x
      ... >> Uhm, if you are using RAID5 and your requests are not aligned and ... I presume you would only compare read to write performance on a RAID5 ... Without a battery backed cache RAID5 ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x
      ... >>two different RAID5 configurations, with different disks, and not just ... > Uhm, if you are using RAID5 and your requests are not aligned and ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x
      ... >>Don't mean to be terse here, but I'm talking about the same test done an ... > Uhm, if you are using RAID5 and your requests are not aligned and ...
      (freebsd-performance)