Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x
From: Petri Helenius (pete_at_he.iki.fi)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: Petri Helenius: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 16:23:23 +0300 To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>In message <427626DC.5030702@centtech.com>, Eric Anderson writes:
>
>
>
>>Don't mean to be terse here, but I'm talking about the same test done an
>>two different RAID5 configurations, with different disks, and not just
>>me - other users in this very thread see the same issue..
>>
>>
>
>Uhm, if you are using RAID5 and your requests are not aligned and
>sized after the RAID5 you should *expect* read performance to be poor.
>
>If you your request ends up accessing two different blocks even just
>once per stripe, this totally kills performance.
>
>
>
>
My tests were using RAID10 and just striping. (RAID0 might be the right
name for it)
Pete
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Petri Helenius: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]