Re: 64bit CPUs
From: David Gilbert (dgilbert_at_dclg.ca)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: Arne : "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Next in thread: Jim C. Nasby: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Reply: Jim C. Nasby: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 10:22:03 -0400 To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes:
Mike> Thanks! I was worried I was missing something obvious in all
Mike> the 64bit excitement. For my apps where I cant balance across
Mike> multiple machines or where space is an issue, dual core CPUs I
Mike> think might be more interesting to look at in a few months.
Hi Mike!
Anyways, we've been finding that raw packet passing is significantly
better on some of the newer tyan opteron boards. But then that may
have as much to do with them shipping with multiple independant PCI-X
slots than the opterons themselves. Memory bandwidth probably doesn't
hurt, either.
Dave.
-- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Arne : "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Next in thread: Jim C. Nasby: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Reply: Jim C. Nasby: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]