Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: David Gilbert: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- In reply to: Allen: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Next in thread: Eric Anderson: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Allen <bsdlists@rfnj.org> Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 16:26:12 +0200
In message <6.2.1.2.2.20050502094757.037077f0@mail.rfnj.org>, Allen writes:
I just want to add: This is why I really would love for us to have
a real RAID3 implemetation.
RAID3 is not commercially viable because windows cannot use non-512
byte sectors.
We can.
RAID3 would scream for us.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: David Gilbert: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- In reply to: Allen: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Next in thread: Eric Anderson: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]