Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x
From: Eric Anderson (anderson_at_centtech.com)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 09:28:22 -0500 To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <6.2.1.2.2.20050502094757.037077f0@mail.rfnj.org>, Allen writes:
>
>
> I just want to add: This is why I really would love for us to have
> a real RAID3 implemetation.
>
> RAID3 is not commercially viable because windows cannot use non-512
> byte sectors.
>
> We can.
>
> RAID3 would scream for us.
What about disk arrays that support RAID3?
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]