Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: Allen: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- In reply to: Sten Spans: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Next in thread: Petri Helenius: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Sten Spans <sten@blinkenlights.nl> Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 23:06:49 +0200
In message <Pine.SOC.4.61.0505022252190.787@tea.blinkenlights.nl>, Sten Spans w
rites:
>>> What about disk arrays that support RAID3?
>>
>> Would work for me, but most of them are dumbed down when they do RAID3:
>> they have to hard format the disks to 128 byte sector sizes and similar
>> madness in order to support 512 bytes sectors on the RAID3 volume.
>
>I would really love the 512 + 8 byte checksum stuff that mainframes
>and netapps do. Does GEOM simplify implementing something like this ?
Yes, GEOM works with arbitrary sectorsizes, but far from all current
GEOM classes does.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Allen: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- In reply to: Sten Spans: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Next in thread: Petri Helenius: "Re: Very low disk performance on 5.x"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|