Re: 64bit CPUs

From: Jim C. Nasby (decibel_at_decibel.org)
Date: 05/03/05

  • Next message: Jim C. Nasby: "Re: 64bit CPUs" 
    Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 18:03:43 -0500
To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca>

    On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:22:03AM -0400, David Gilbert wrote:
    > >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes:
    >
    > Mike> Thanks! I was worried I was missing something obvious in all
    > Mike> the 64bit excitement. For my apps where I cant balance across
    > Mike> multiple machines or where space is an issue, dual core CPUs I
    > Mike> think might be more interesting to look at in a few months.
    >
    > Hi Mike!
    >
    > Anyways, we've been finding that raw packet passing is significantly
    > better on some of the newer tyan opteron boards. But then that may
    > have as much to do with them shipping with multiple independant PCI-X
    > slots than the opterons themselves. Memory bandwidth probably doesn't
    > hurt, either.

    I was just going to mention that what's more important than gobs of
    memory is memory bandwidth, which the Opterons have much more of than
    other CPUs. So any application that needs to move a lot of data, whether
    a database or a router, will benefit. 

    -- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Jim C. Nasby: "Re: 64bit CPUs"