Re: rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar
From: Bruce Evans (bde_at_zeta.org.au)
Date: 05/31/05
- Previous message: Tulio Guimarães da Silva: "rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar"
- In reply to: Tulio Guimarães da Silva: "rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar"
- Next in thread: David Gilbert: "Re: rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar"
- Reply: David Gilbert: "Re: rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:18:06 +1000 (EST) To: Tulio Guimarães da Silva <tuliogs@pgt.mpt.gov.br>
> Observe that I bypassed rmt; that bumped the transfer rate to 10.976.153,96
> Bytes/s, almost 30x faster. Should this really happen? (And yes, I read
> rmt(8), but found nothing about this. :( ).
> Thanks for your help;
ISTR that remote tars have a delay of 10 msec or so for each block because
the protocol needs to talk after each block (it doesn't stream) and there
is a TCP startup delay of this amount.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Tulio Guimarães da Silva: "rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar"
- In reply to: Tulio Guimarães da Silva: "rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar"
- Next in thread: David Gilbert: "Re: rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar"
- Reply: David Gilbert: "Re: rmt as a bottleneck - Was: Weird behaviour of AIT-3 and (g)tar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
