Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?
From: Arkadi Shishlov (arkadi_at_mebius.lv)
Date: 06/24/05
- Previous message: Steven Hartland: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- In reply to: Eric Anderson: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- Next in thread: Thomas Hurst: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- Reply: Thomas Hurst: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- Reply: Achim Patzner: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:39:26 +0300 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 06:28:48AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
> >Yer know about the list but was looking for real usage experiences
> >as I've tried supported cards before e.g. netgear and it just panics the
> >machine with just ping :(
>
> I use the em cards (Intel Pro 1000/MT's and the like) in many machines
> here, and they are rock solid. You'll pay a little more for them, but
> there is a reason for it.
Whats about performance and stability with MTU > 1500? I tried increasing
MTU on my Intel-made servers to speed-up NFS, but both 5.3 em and 2.x Intel
provided drivers get stuck after some time with interface in OACTIVE state.
arkadi.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Steven Hartland: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- In reply to: Eric Anderson: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- Next in thread: Thomas Hurst: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- Reply: Thomas Hurst: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- Reply: Achim Patzner: "Re: Fibre Gig card recommendations?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]