Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?
From: Darren Reed (darrenr_at_hub.freebsd.org)
Date: 08/07/05
- Previous message: David Malone: "Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- Maybe in reply to: Xin LI: "[RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- Next in thread: Mike Silbersack: "Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:43:38 +0000 To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:51:29AM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
...
> My proposal is to increase the default dirhash_maxmem value to at least
> 32MB or 64MB. Any objections?
>
> Cons for this, discussed in -developer:
> - dirhash does not implements automatical mechanism to reduce memory
> usage in response to system memory pressure, and benefits mainly to
> large directories, e.g. Maildirs.
So why not make the determination of "dirhash_maxmem" the result of some
calculation(s) that takes into account RAM size, etc ?
The obvious lesson here is that picking a number to be a limit based on
the current size of machines fails the test of time.
Darren
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: David Malone: "Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- Maybe in reply to: Xin LI: "[RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- Next in thread: Mike Silbersack: "Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|