Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing...
From: Suleiman Souhlal (ssouhlal_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 08/08/05
- Previous message: Darren Reed: "Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- In reply to: gnn_at_freebsd.org: "Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing..."
- Next in thread: Xin LI: "Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing..."
- Reply: Xin LI: "Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 03:15:59 +0200 To: gnn@FreeBSD.org
Hello,
On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:25 PM, gnn@freebsd.org wrote:
> I plan to make a port of this this weekend, but would like some
> feedback on this set of benchmarks. If they're useful I think we
> should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy.
In case you're interested, I ran it on a dual p4 xeon (without
HyperThreading) from the netperf cluster, to compare the performance
of RELENG_5, RELENG_6 and HEAD.
You can find the results at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/stuff/
compare_tiger-3.html .
It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are (in these tests) almost never
slower than RELENG_5, and often more than 20% faster.
-- Suleiman Souhlal | ssouhlal@vt.edu The FreeBSD Project | ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Darren Reed: "Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- In reply to: gnn_at_freebsd.org: "Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing..."
- Next in thread: Xin LI: "Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing..."
- Reply: Xin LI: "Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]