Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing...

From: Xin LI (delphij_at_frontfree.net)
Date: 08/08/05

  • Next message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?" 
    To: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:01:17 +0800

    在 2005-08-08一的 03:15 +0200，Suleiman Souhlal写道：
    > Hello,
    >
    > On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:25 PM, gnn@freebsd.org wrote:
    >
    > > I plan to make a port of this this weekend, but would like some
    > > feedback on this set of benchmarks. If they're useful I think we
    > > should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy.
    >
    > In case you're interested, I ran it on a dual p4 xeon (without
    > HyperThreading) from the netperf cluster, to compare the performance
    > of RELENG_5, RELENG_6 and HEAD.
    > You can find the results at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/stuff/
    > compare_tiger-3.html .
    > It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are (in these tests) almost never
    > slower than RELENG_5, and often more than 20% faster.

    Great work! BTW. Is there any clue about why pthread_128 looks slower
    than RELENG_5 and then recovered in HEAD?

    Cheers, 

    -- 
Xin LI <delphij delphij net>  http://www.delphij.net/

  • Next message: Mike Silbersack: "Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: How do I submit a bug?
      ... I have tried Firefox, Mozilla and even IE and ... If you want to submit a port, a preferred way is to sharyour port ... Xin LI <delphij delphij net> http://www.delphij.net/ ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing...
      ... > feedback on this set of benchmarks. ... > should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy. ... It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are almost never ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-performance)