Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?
From: Mike Silbersack (silby_at_silby.com)
Date: 08/08/05
- Previous message: Xin LI: "Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing..."
- Maybe in reply to: Xin LI: "[RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:21:28 -0500 (CDT) To: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Xin LI wrote:
> [Bcc'ed to -developers@, so this can be discussed in a public list]
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is set to 2MB. I think this value
> is slightly too small for modern machines:
>
> My proposal is to increase the default dirhash_maxmem value to at least
> 32MB or 64MB. Any objections?
Scale it to the kernel map size by throwing something in the init_param3
function inside subr_param.c. That way all you have to do is put a floor
on it, no need to worry about putting a ceiling on it.
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Xin LI: "Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing..."
- Maybe in reply to: Xin LI: "[RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
