Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow
From: Francisco (francisco_at_natserv.net)
Date: 09/23/05
- Previous message: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Finding what's causing I/O"
- In reply to: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow"
- Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow"
- Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:13:59 -0400 (EDT) To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Small writes are pretty much the worst-case scenario for RAID-5,
Such as mail servers?
How about for a DB server which is mostly read only?
> normal to see a very significant performance drop-- by up to an order of
> magnitude-- from the performance of a bare drive.
At which point Raid 5 starts to perform better?
6,8,10 drives?
How about RAID 10 for a DB server?
I have been trying to convince the "powers that be" that SCSI would be
much better.. but the price difference is just too astronomical for the
capacities we need (500GB to 2 TB)
Even 10K RPM IDE drives seem like would be a problem since they are mostly
small in size.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Finding what's causing I/O"
- In reply to: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow"
- Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow"
- Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|