Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow

From: Eric Anderson (anderson_at_centtech.com)
Date: 09/23/05

  • Next message: Mariano Benedettini: "Re: High load average mail server 5.3-RELEASE"
    Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:32:37 -0500
    To: Francisco <francisco@natserv.net>
    
    

    Francisco wrote:
    > On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Chuck Swiger wrote:
    >
    >> Small writes are pretty much the worst-case scenario for RAID-5,
    >
    >
    > Such as mail servers?
    > How about for a DB server which is mostly read only?
    >
    >> normal to see a very significant performance drop-- by up to an order
    >> of magnitude-- from the performance of a bare drive.
    >
    >
    >
    > At which point Raid 5 starts to perform better?
    > 6,8,10 drives?
    >
    >
    > How about RAID 10 for a DB server?
    > I have been trying to convince the "powers that be" that SCSI would be
    > much better.. but the price difference is just too astronomical for the
    > capacities we need (500GB to 2 TB)
    >
    > Even 10K RPM IDE drives seem like would be a problem since they are
    > mostly small in size.

    I have a 16 disk SATA (WD Raptor 74GB drives) build with a RAID0+1
    (maybe called a RAID10 by others) connected via fiber channel, and I get
    extremely fast data rates with it. A RAID0+1 is much faster at writes
    than a RAID5, and I believe faster at reads too. I've gotten
    180-190MB/s from this disk, which is probably the most I could ask for
    on a 2gbit connection.

    For databases, this is a great solution (I have a MySQL db running on
    one - never disk bound, ever).

    I bought the array here:
    http://www.acnc.com

    They are FreeBSD friendly (and even support it too!) and have tools for
    FreeBSD as well as all the other OS's too. I've had great luck so far
    with them. One recommendation - get 1GB cache on the boxes - you'll see
    huge performance improvements for very little cost.

    Eric

    -- 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Eric Anderson        Sr. Systems Administrator        Centaur Technology
    Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Mariano Benedettini: "Re: High load average mail server 5.3-RELEASE"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: FreeBSD 6.0 compat with DL320 G4
      ... what happens if you configure it via rc.conf is the server ... FreeBSD 6.0 compat with DL320 G4 ... If the ethernet chipset support at the moment is flakey then I might ... RAID firmware in this server is useless. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: freebsd vs. linux - educated opinions wanted
      ... I had to switch my media server from FreeBSd to Linux due ... > to the lack of full support for the 3Ware IDE RAID card in FreeBSD. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • RE: FreeBSD 5.5 persistent crashing
      ... It's a SuperMicro server with a 3ware 8006/2LP RAID card. ... We've not yet properly tried Kostiks patch as we've only updated to FreeBSD ... #12 0xc0601e4f in syscall (frame= ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: 3Ware 7500-4 Slow
      ... Such as mail servers? ... How about for a DB server which is mostly read only? ... At which point Raid 5 starts to perform better? ... Even 10K RPM IDE drives seem like would be a problem since they are mostly ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: Data Storage Plan?
      ... FreeBSD ... > shell I install/set FTP server, HTTP server, SAMBA, etc. ... a dlt tape drive and scsi raid for about $1000US a year ago. ... The tape backup solution ...
      (freebsd-questions)