Re: Benchmark MySQL Performance On FreeBSD And Linux
- From: "Gustavo A. Baratto" <gbaratto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:20:46 -0800
So, is ULE ready for production on 6.0-RELEASE? Can we use it without fear?
Cheers
Gea-Suan Lin wrote:
Hi,
In http://blog.gslin.org/archives/2005/12/12/252/ we test more cases, and summary some important conclusions:
* SCHED_ULE (kernel options) is faster than SCHED_4BSD.
* Use kern.timecounter.choice=TSC (sysctl) will be faster than ACPI-fast or ACPI-safe. (about 10% again)
And I notice you use kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp in Debian, but not use "CPUTYPE?= p3" in /etc/make.conf to compile kernel.
And you should disable these options, it may increase ~10% again:
-cpu I486_CPU -cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU
_______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Benchmark MySQL Performance On FreeBSD And Linux
- From: Gea-Suan Lin
- Re: Benchmark MySQL Performance On FreeBSD And Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: new benchmarks. WAS: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
- Next by Date: Re: Benchmark MySQL Performance On FreeBSD And Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Benchmark MySQL Performance On FreeBSD And Linux
- Next by thread: Device polling heavy traffic
- Index(es):