Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- From: "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:58:47 -0600
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:42:02AM -0800, Arne Woerner wrote:
> Did you do those "dd" tests with small block sizes (like 1byte:
> bs=1), like somebody on one of those lists suggests, too? Then we
> could see, if there is a high latency that ruins everything...
FYI, PostgreSQL does 8kB I/O by default. This can only be changed by
modifying a header file.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- From: Brooks Davis
- Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- References:
- Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- From: Slawek Zak
- Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- From: Arne Woerner
- Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- Prev by Date: Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- Next by Date: Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- Previous by thread: Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- Next by thread: Re: Horrible PostgreSQL performance with NFS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|