Re: mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- From: Sven Petai <hadara@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 14:02:00 +0300
On Saturday 08 April 2006 13:32, David Xu wrote:
On Saturday 08 April 2006 17:44, Michael Vince wrote:
I have also tried putting my Perl under libthr for a single thread log
analyzer and to my surprise it even could process logs faster.
I don't know why, but I only know I did some micro optimizations in libthr,
and the library is small and may be fully cached in L1 cache on athlon
xp/64 CPU, don't take it seriously. ;-)
libthr is also really useful for actually paying attention to tops 'thr'
column since it does show actual true thread number activity, under
pthread it shows a couple and under libc_r I could have 1000 threads
going but top just shows 1.
Which makes me wonder if anyone has seen any realistic workload type under
which kse library would outperform libthr ?
My experiences have always been pretty much the same as yours - everything
seems to be faster with libthr and in the case of mysql, even more stable.
So shouldn't libthr be made the default one instead of libkse ?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- From: Sven Petai
- Re: mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- From: Michael Vince
- Re: mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- From: David Xu
- mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- Prev by Date: Re: mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- Next by Date: Re: mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- Previous by thread: Re: mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- Next by thread: Re: mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron
- Index(es):