Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Bill Moran <wmoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:42:42 -0400
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:35:06 -0400
David Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Mike" == Mike Jakubik <mikej@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Mike> Steven Hartland wrote:
Forget Intel and go for AMD who beat them hands down for DB work:
http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2745
Mike> It will be interesting to see how Intels new CPUs (Conroe,
Mike> Woodcrest, etc) will perform. From initial gaming benchmarks,
Mike> they seems to outperform the current AMD offerings. But for
Mike> current technology i agree, go for an Opteron system.
This isn't random. As I understand the issue, the Opteron HT bus
handles synchronization much faster. So for a game --- this doesn't
matter ... games don't (usually) need sync. Databases, however, live
on synchonizaton. If you're a Dell man (and already paying the Dell
tax), consider the Sun 1U's. They offer up to 4 cores in a 1U.
Lost me here.
Are you saying 1U units from Sun? Or does Dell have a 1U called a
"Sun"?
I am pretty-much locked into Dell - decision made by others. Actually,
I've been pretty happy with the Dell HW, but it's a shame they don't
offer AMD servers.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- References:
- Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Bill Moran
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Steven Hartland
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: David Gilbert
- Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|