Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:20:38 -0700
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Steven Hartland wrote:
IIRC AM2 is not a server solution just a client one the new server
socket is significantly different.
Its not a server/desktop thing, its a new socket that will allow AMD to
use DDR2 memory. It applies to both Athlons and Opterons.
No! Socket AM2 is the DDR2 939-pin Athlon64 desktop replacement.
Socket F(1207) is DDR2 the 940-pin Opteron server replacement.
--
-- David (obrien@xxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- References:
- Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Bill Moran
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Steven Hartland
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: David Gilbert
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Steven Hartland
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|