Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:03:13 -0700
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:11:05PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@xxxxxxxxxx>
No! Socket AM2 is the DDR2 939-pin Athlon64 desktop replacement.
Socket F(1207) is DDR2 the 940-pin Opteron server replacement.
Same crap, different pins. The change simply allows AMD cpus to use DDR2
memory, nothing more.
Getting off topic now but I'd submit to you that a 1207 pin vs 940 pin
is setting up for the access requirements of quad core something that
AM2 is not going to be capable of hence quite different indeed.
Nope. Quad core is internal connections between cores - not external.
So you don't need extra pins to support quad-core vs. dual-core.
--
-- David (obrien@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Steven Hartland
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- References:
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Steven Hartland
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|