Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:47:20 +0000 (GMT)
SA> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:59:03 +0930
SA> From: Shane Ambler
SA> I haven't dug real deep for data but a casual look through the
SA> Intel's dual Xeon board specs shows they don't say where their
SA> network controllers are connected but some of their boards have an
SA> Intel ethernet controller as well as "one Marvell* Yukon* -EC
SA> 88E8050 PCI Express*"
Search for "CSA bus" or "communications streaming architecture" for
Intel's perspective.
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc@xxxxxxxxx -*- jfconmaapaq@xxxxxxxx -*- sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- From: Shane Ambler
- Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
- Index(es):