Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:23:31 -0400
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:22:06AM +0800, David Xu wrote:
On Monday 08 May 2006 07:04, Kris Kennaway wrote:
i.e. apparently not a large difference, but still a large proportionThis becauses there is no sleepable mutex available, so I had to use
of cases where multiple CPUs are woken at once on the same chain.
Kris
msleep and wakeup, this is suboptimal, I may put flag MTX_QUIET there
to let WITNESS shut up.
Can you use wakeup_one()?
Kris
Attachment:
pgplytfHQuUQK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: David Xu
- Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Prev by Date: Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Next by Date: Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Previous by thread: Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Next by thread: Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|