Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:34:20 -0500
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:47:27PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Robert Watson, and lo! it spake thus:
In past discussion, I think a reasonable conclusion has been some
amount of both.
I've still got
<http://bsd.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162629&cid=13611424> sitting
around in my bookmarks from a previous iteration. Point (5) makes me
twitch every time I read it ;)
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: Sven Petai
- Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- From: Robert Watson
- Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Prev by Date: Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Next by Date: Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Previous by thread: Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain sockets)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|