Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets ( UNIX domain sockets )

On Friday 12 May 2006 01:58, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Scott Long wrote:
So I guess the real question is: do we want to merge the UNIX domain
socket locking work? The MySQL gains sound good, the performance drop
under very high load seems problematic, and there are more general
questions about performance with other workloads.

Maintaining this patch for a month or so is no problem, but as the tree
changes it will get harder.

The only thing I'm afraid of is that it'll get pushed onto the
back-burner once it's in CVS, and we'll have a mad scramble to fix it
when it's time for 7.0. That's not a show-stopper for it going in, as
there are also numerous benefits. It's just something that needs to be
tracked and worked on.

I should be able to support/improve UNIX domain sockets moving forward
without a problem -- the maintenance issue is maintaining it in P4
indefinitely, not in the tree indefinitely, as the patch basically touches
every line in the file, so any change in the vendor branch (FreeBSD CVS)
will put the entire file into conflict. To be specific: I'll track and own
this, but want to avoid having it in P4 indefinitely, because it will get
stale :-).

Robert N M Watson

Your patch makes other bottlenecks more visible than before, for example,
file descriptor locking, but it is not a problem of your patch, so I think
it is fine to commit it.

David Xu
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets ( UNIX domain sockets )
    ... On Friday 12 May 2006 01:58, Robert Watson wrote: ... Maintaining this patch for a month or so is no problem, ... so any change in the vendor branch (FreeBSD CVS) ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: Jail support for mac_portacl(4).
    ... On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 15:02 +0100, Robert Watson wrote: ... I think pjd@'s syntax changes are not that flexible (and well, ... the uid/gid field). ... he can modify this patch to his style and apply the ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)
  • Re: [PATCH] poll() hang with X apps
    ... Robert Watson wrote: ... Assuming this patch does fix ... > the problem for you (it did for Doug), I'll get it merged into HEAD ... I haven't seen any wmdockapps hangs yet, ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: what to replace splnet in FreeBSD 5.x?
    ... On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Robert Watson wrote: ... >> The attached patch introduces locking around the link layer and IPv4 ... >> multicast address lists, as well as updates drivers to use the locking. ...
    (freebsd-net)