Re: RAID 5 stripe size and newfs args
- From: Eric Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 23:32:30 -0500
On 08/02/06 22:59, Kevin Taber wrote:
Hardware: HP DL380 G4, 3.2Ghz Xeon EM64T, Smart Array 6i, 3GB RAM, 2 logical
drives: 2 x 36GB Ultra320 15k and 4 x 146GB Ultra320 10k
RAID setup in question: 4 x 146GB Ultra320 drives ( roughly 300GB raid 5 )
I'm setting this array up for samba use... Windows 2003 folders will
redirect to a share. I'm going with a raid stripe size of 128KB, what
should my newfs args be? I have heard mixed answers via IRC.
I think if I recall correctly you'll want to make sure your filesystem starts on one of the stripe offsets, so either at 0 bytes, or 128k byte offset. If I recall, either phk@ or scottl@ knew the right magic for that.
Maybe this paper is related:
http://db.usenix.org/events/fast02/schindler/schindler_html/index.html
The best way to know for sure, is to test it with your type of workload (simulated or real).
Eric
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- RAID 5 stripe size and newfs args
- From: Kevin Taber
- RAID 5 stripe size and newfs args
- Prev by Date: RAID 5 stripe size and newfs args
- Next by Date: Re: about the performance comparsion of 6.1 vs 5.3 on amd64
- Previous by thread: RAID 5 stripe size and newfs args
- Next by thread: RAID 5 stripe size and newfs args
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|