Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Danial Thom <danial_thom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Yeah, bury your head in the sand as always.
Its been proven over and over. Robert Watson has
admitted many times that 6.x is not as fast as
4.x uniprocessor, but you guys still continue to
claim otherwise. Clowns following clowns to the
land of nowhere.
Its virtually impossible to build a threaded
kernel that is faster than a non-threaded kernel
for UP operation. You can ask Matt Dillon or
Robert Watson or Terry Lambert or anyone else
that you think has a brain. Its just plain
stupid to suggest otherwise.
--- Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:17:31PM -0500,
Derrick T. Woolworth wrote:
Where are the numbers for this? Where is theproof? Are you using
CARP and PF in the 4.x kernel? Are you usingUNIX sockets in 4.x?
substantiated leads me to
The fact that your claims haven't been
believe you're not really trying to solve anyproblems.
Just ignore this guy, he has an extremely
narrow focus of what he
wants to use FreeBSD for, and since FreeBSD
doesn't meet his standards
in this single area he claims that the entire
OS is useless for any
purposes.
Kris
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- References:
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with improving mysql performance on 6.2PRE
- Next by Date: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Next by thread: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
