Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x (was: e: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon)
- From: Mike Horwath <drechsau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:10:23 -0500
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:57:32AM -0700, Danial Thom wrote:
Hi Kip,
Where you a troll when you outlined how your port
of FreeBSD 6 to Solaris was so bad that it was
virtually unusable? Stating facts is not
trolling.
And you crossposted this to performance...why?
Kip might be right, you could be a troll.
I am not on freebsd-stable.
And I do miss Mr. Dillon but I don't think he needs your support,
unless you are going to run DragonFly BSD - which I kind of doubt you
are since it isn't 64bit and does not fit your latest must be greated
mentality.
--
Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Next by Date: 4.X vs 5.X && Danial Thom === Waste of Time
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x (was: e: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon)
- Next by thread: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x (was: e: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
