Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Danial Thom <danial_thom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
--- Mark Linimon <linimon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400,
Michael Butler wrote:
For everyone's benefit then, please feel freeto submit your patches
along with your technical analysis.
I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then
he can tell all the people
that volunteer to work on _his_ project exactly
what to do, and see how
far he gets with that approach.
As an extra-special bonus, since it's the BSD
license, he can start with
whatever version of FreeBSD he finds most meets
his needs.
Even better, with his own project, he can then
redirect all his postings
there and leave the rest of us in peace.
Until then, I think I'll watch out for any
flying monkeys. I consider
their existance equally probable.
mcl
Why do I need to start a project? Matt Dillon is
already doing it.
One thing that Matt has proved is that IQ isn't
cumulative. Because hes doing on his own what an
entire team of FreeBSD "engineers" can't do. But
hey, you're not getting paid, so I guess we
shouldn't expect anything good. Bravo for trying
guys. We appreciate your wasted efforts.
I'm not nearly as concerned about the project at
this point. Dfly will be usable before freebsd,
and at least we know there's someone that knows
what they're doing over there. What concerns me
is the lying to all of the small businessman out
there. People wasting their money on hardware
that freebsd can't utilize. And you clowns
telling them how great it is. Its just plain
dishonest.
DT
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: RoBeRT B
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- References:
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Mark Linimon
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Prev by Date: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Next by Date: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Next by thread: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|