Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:35:07 -0300
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
Danial Thom <danial_thom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why do I need to start a project? Matt Dillon is
already doing it.
One thing that Matt has proved is that IQ isn't
cumulative. Because hes doing on his own what an
entire team of FreeBSD "engineers" can't do. But
hey, you're not getting paid, so I guess we
shouldn't expect anything good. Bravo for trying
guys. We appreciate your wasted efforts.
Sorry, but I don't get your point. Why aren't you using Dragonfly or Linux
or any other OS that suits your needs already?
I'm not nearly as concerned about the project at
this point. Dfly will be usable before freebsd,
and at least we know there's someone that knows
what they're doing over there. What concerns me
is the lying to all of the small businessman out
there. People wasting their money on hardware
that freebsd can't utilize. And you clowns
telling them how great it is. Its just plain
dishonest.
And another: have you read (and understood) the copyright message?
Specifically this part (deCAPSed for your comfort):
"This software is provided by the regents and contributors ``as is'' and
any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the
implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose
are disclaimed."
I don't have the IQ to understand why do you keep using FreeBSD if it makes
you unhappy, doesn't support the hardware you bought/have, perform poorly on
most situations you have to deal with, and you think its developers don't
have a clue of what they're doing.
--
Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@{gmail.com,wait4.org}>
Powered by FreeBSD
"Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Mark Linimon
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- From: Danial Thom
- Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Prev by Date: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Next by Date: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
- Next by thread: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x (was: e: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
