Re: DNS Performance Numbers
- From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:22:58 -0200
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:18:01 +0100
"O. Hartmann" <ohartman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, I complain about the dramatic performance drainage of FreeBSD and
would also say, that my main purpose for an UNIX driven box isn't the
service for network like routing, DNS and others. But I'm frightened by
the poor network performance when I have MPI in vi>
OK, but DNS queries are short (less than 1 KB). You probably know much
better than me (I also work with scientific computing, but it's been only 4
years) that you can't expect terrific performance with thousands of messages
per second -- this will always be your bottleneck.
As such, I believe it's unfair (and imprecise) to use DNS performance results
for a group communication (MPI) environment comparison. I had good
experiences with MPI + FreeBSD, although don't have numbers to prove.
Regards. :)
--
Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@{gmail.com,wait4.org}>
Powered by FreeBSD
"Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: DNS Performance Numbers
- From: Mark Bucciarelli
- Re: DNS Performance Numbers
- From: O. Hartmann
- Re: DNS Performance Numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: DNS Performance Numbers
- Next by Date: Re: DNS Performance Numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: DNS Performance Numbers
- Next by thread: trouble with mysql replica and 3ware 9590 RAID controller
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
