Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: "Vlad Galu" <dudu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:43:44 +0200
On 11/23/06, Mike Tancsa <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 08:09 AM 11/22/2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>It would be interesting to know the real performance of Linux as a mere
>router if we want a true comparision with FreeBSD performances.
Re-tested, this time with a LINUX UP kernel and there is not that
much difference in overall speeds. I added a few IPTABLES rules which
loaded a few of the modules.
Can you please completely remove the iptables support from your
Linux configuration, as well as removing support for any packet filter
in FreeBSD? Also, please enable fast_forwarding.
--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Jeremie Le Hen
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Prev by Date: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Next by Date: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Previous by thread: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Next by thread: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|