Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:51:47 -0500
At 04:03 PM 11/24/2006, Divacky Roman wrote:
I see generic_bzero/bcopy used quite often. why dont you define
cpu I586_CPU
in your kernel config?
Hi,
I cvsup'd to todays kernel and re-ran some of the tests, controlling for CPU defs in the kernel. Posted at http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html
Statistically, I think the results are too close to say they are different.
---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Steven Hartland
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- References:
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Jeremie Le Hen
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Massimo Lusetti
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Divacky Roman
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Prev by Date: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Next by Date: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Previous by thread: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Next by thread: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Index(es):