Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:54:34 -0500
At 02:12 PM 11/25/2006, Nick Pavlica wrote:
I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference.
Mike,
Have you done any testing on Solaris 10, or OpenSolaris? I
understand that it has a very robust IP stack. It would be
Did a quick default install. Results are not so interesting since one stream livelocks the box. Basic stats at http://www.tancsa.com/blast.html
If there are some OpenSolaris wizards out there who want me to tune, I am happy to retest...
---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Nick Pavlica
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- References:
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Jeremie Le Hen
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Nick Pavlica
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Prev by Date: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Next by Date: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Previous by thread: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Next by thread: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|