Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- From: Mike Tancsa <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:26:17 -0500
Did some more tests, this time using a single NIC interface in trunking mode. Strangely enough, the speed is a little faster on HEAD. Perhaps less interrupt processing ? Results in the usual place
http://www.tancsa.com//blast.html
---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- References:
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Jeremie Le Hen
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Massimo Lusetti
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Massimo Lusetti
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Prev by Date: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Next by Date: Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- Previous by thread: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Next by thread: Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- Index(es):