Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- From: Mike Tancsa <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:49:08 -0500
At 04:35 PM 11/29/2006, Robert Watson wrote:
You may want to datestamp the version of HEAD you're using in each test (assuming it changes between tests).
Ahh, Good point. I have been using the sources always from Nov 24th to make comparisons as similar as possible for the tests with 7.0
which will affect a broad range of performance characteristics. There have also been VLAN tagging related performance improvements made in HEAD that aren't present in RELENG_6, avoiding extra memory allocations and frees in storing the tags.
I ran the tests against RELENG_6 then as well and have posted those results. There does indeed seem to be a slight improvement in HEAD over RELENG_6.
---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Jeremie Le Hen
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Massimo Lusetti
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Massimo Lusetti
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- From: Mike Tancsa
- Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Prev by Date: Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- Next by Date: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Previous by thread: Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)
- Next by thread: Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|