Re: Cached file read performance
- From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:09:48 +0900
On 22/12/06, David Xu <davidxu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I suspect in such a test, memory copying speed will be a key factor,
I don't have number to back up my idea, but I think Linux has lots
of tweaks, such as using MMX instruction to copy data.
I had the oppertunity to study the AMD Athlon XP Optimisation guide
and noted their example copy routine, optimised for the chipset, was
quite a hell of a lot faster over a straight block copy.
Has anyone here done any similar modifications to optimise
copyin/copyout? I can't imagine it'd be a bad thing to have.
Adrian
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cached file read performance
- From: Bruce Evans
- Re: Cached file read performance
- References:
- Cached file read performance
- From: Mark Kirkwood
- Re: Cached file read performance
- From: David Xu
- Cached file read performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Cached file read performance
- Next by Date: Re: Cached file read performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Cached file read performance
- Next by thread: Re: Cached file read performance
- Index(es):