Re: diskio low read performance

From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:42:32 -0500

On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:

I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no improvement
I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem
value.

Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely
nothing in relationship to the disk read access performance. That is
disappointing.

Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? Or is it that squid does not work
well on 6.2?

Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc?

Kris

Attachment: pgpAZz9ZypNDs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: diskio low read performance
  - From: Michel Santos

References:
- diskio low read performance
  - From: Michel Santos
- Re: diskio low read performance
  - From: Mark Kirkwood
- Re: diskio low read performance
  - From: Michel Santos

Prev by Date: Re: network perf : em driver ? [solved]
Next by Date: Re: diskio low read performance
Previous by thread: Re: diskio low read performance
Next by thread: Re: diskio low read performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: diskio low read performance
... Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely ... Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc? ... mais que montam neles, pior que ficam ... ...
(freebsd-performance)
Re: diskio low read performance
... Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely ... Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc? ...
(freebsd-performance)