Re: diskio low read performance


Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem:
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:

I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no
improvement
I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher
vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem
value.

Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely
nothing in relationship to the disk read access performance. That is
disappointing.

Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? Or is it that squid does not work
well on 6.2?

Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc?

Kris


Yes, if you used to squid I am running the last 2.5-Stable14 version which
run best on 4.11



Michel




computador é como nem cavalo e mulher
mais que montam neles, pior que ficam ...




****************************************************
Datacenter Matik http://datacenter.matik.com.br
E-Mail e Data Hosting Service para Profissionais.
****************************************************

_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: diskio low read performance
    ... Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely ... Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? ... Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc? ...
    (freebsd-performance)
  • Re: diskio low read performance
    ... Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely ... Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc? ...
    (freebsd-performance)