Re: diskio low read performance
- From: "Michel Santos" <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:23:39 -0200 (BRST)
Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem:
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:58:06PM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:
I have two server, the main server is a Supermicro Dualcore Dual Opteron
and the backup is a Athlon64 X2, both with 4GB
The disks are the same, only the onboard SCSI is Adaptec and the other
is
LSI. Funny is that I have no difference regarding the disk read
performance wether I use the Opteron machine or the other
dmesg Opteron
http://suporte.lucenet.com.br/ms/dmesg.sm
dmesg X2
http://suporte.lucenet.com.br/ms/dmesg.x2
kernel config
http://suporte.lucenet.com.br/ms/kernel62
options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler
From the NOTES file from where you copied this:
# SCHED_ULE is a new scheduler that has been designed for SMP and has some
# advantages for UP as well. It is intended to replace the 4BSD scheduler
# over time. NOTE: SCHED_ULE is currently considered experimental and is
# not recommended for production use at this time.
When investigating problems with your system, your very first step
should be to revert the use of code marked "experimental" and "not
recommended for production use" ;-)
I am running both (on at a time of course :) ), now for six month or so,
ULE is giving me better overall performance, either with or w/o polling. I
mean network performance. I have net.isr.enable=1 and
net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=1,
this way I do get the same network performance I had on the 4.11. I mean I
have no problem here.
But also I checked the ULE/BSD against my particular problem and there is
no difference at all. I get no acceptable disk read performance when
comparing what I had with 4.11, wether with ULE or with 4BSD
Michel
computador é como nem cavalo e mulher
mais que montam neles, pior que ficam ...
****************************************************
Datacenter Matik http://datacenter.matik.com.br
E-Mail e Data Hosting Service para Profissionais.
****************************************************
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: diskio low read performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: diskio low read performance
- References:
- diskio low read performance
- From: Michel Santos
- Re: diskio low read performance
- From: Mark Kirkwood
- Re: diskio low read performance
- From: Michel Santos
- Re: diskio low read performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: diskio low read performance
- From: Michel Santos
- Re: diskio low read performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: diskio low read performance
- From: Michel Santos
- Re: diskio low read performance
- From: Kris Kennaway
- diskio low read performance
- Prev by Date: Re: diskio low read performance
- Next by Date: Re: diskio low read performance
- Previous by thread: Re: diskio low read performance
- Next by thread: Re: diskio low read performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|