Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:15:40 +0100
Kris Kennaway wrote:
6.2 and 7.0 CVS sources (which are graphed on Jeff's blog and my
webpage linked there) are unlikely to differ much: as I said, filedesc
locking was key to fixing performance here. I'm sure we'll be
promoting this improvement heavily when 7.0 enters release cycle, to
encourage people to consider upgrading.
Sorry, I was very imprecise - I meant 6.2 vs 7-current+patches from that
benchmark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- References:
- Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Petri Helenius
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Petri Helenius
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Prev by Date: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Next by Date: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Previous by thread: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Next by thread: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|