Re: [HACKERS] Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:09:24 -0400
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:36:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I have not studied the exact code path, but there are indeed multiple
wakeups happening from the semaphore code (as many as the number of
active postgresql processes). It is easy to instrument
sleepq_broadcast() and log them when they happen.
There are certainly cases where Postgres will wake up a number of
processes in quick succession, but that should happen from a separate
semop() kernel call, on a different semaphore, for each such process.
If there's really multiple processes being released by the same semop()
then there's a bug we need to look into (or maybe it's a kernel bug?).
Anyway I'd be interested to know what the test case is, and which PG
version you were testing.
I used 8.2 (and some older version when I first noticed it a year ago)
and either sysbench or supersmack will show it - presumably anything
that makes simultaneous queries. Just instrument sleepq_broadcast()
to e.g. log a KTR event when it wakes more than 1 process and you'll
see it happening.
Kris
Attachment:
pgpssfp0JESqw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- From: Mark Kirkwood
- Re: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: [HACKERS] Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- Prev by Date: Re: [HACKERS] Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- Next by Date: Re: [HACKERS] Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- Next by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|