Re: hd device names
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:53:18 -0400
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:45:47PM -0300, NOC Meganet wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2007 11:30:24 Arne W?rner wrote:
--- NOC Prowip <tec@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why d?nt u use glabel?
hmm, I never considered it
but I guess it does not solve my problem because let's say da0 is the
provider and da0 might have still the label I gave it but the OS can not
see it since it is then aacd0 after changing the controller or am I
wrong?
Hmm...
Advisory: :-))
1.
Just try it. Dont believe me without thorough testing... :-)
E. g. with (a) mdconfig -a -u 0 -f testdevfile ; glabel label -v fook md0 ;
mdconfig -d -u 0 ; mdconfig -a -u 69 -f testdevfile ; ls /dev/label
2.
I think that is one advantage of glabel: It does not care for the device
name, but it just tastes the last sector of each device, as soon as it
shows up (e. g. after the reboot).
thank's Arne, I will give it a try on a test machine and give you a feedback
on it
Also this has nothing to do with FreeBSD performance so followups
should be elsewhere.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: hd device names
- From: Wörner
- Re: hd device names
- From: NOC Meganet
- Re: hd device names
- Prev by Date: Re: hd device names
- Next by Date: Intel PRO/10GbE CX4? General 10Gb tips?
- Previous by thread: Re: hd device names
- Next by thread: Intel PRO/10GbE CX4? General 10Gb tips?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|