Re: Bad performance while transfer large block size through NFS.
- From: Arne "Wörner" <arne_woerner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 05:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
I set up one NFS server, and mounted on other server by TCP. ServersI dont know if it makes any sense, but at least the following experiment might
connected with Giga network, and running 6.2-RELEASE.
But I found the performance is very bad while transfering large block
size data.
be fun:
1. With various block sizes (e. g. 32k, 128k, 1m, 2m) on the client box:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=XXX count=1k
2. With various block sizes (e. g. 32k, 128k, 1m, 2m) on the client box:
dd if=/dev/zero bs=XXX count=1k | dd of=/path/to/nfs/mount bs=32k
3. With various block sizes (e. g. 32k, 128k, 1m, 2m) on the client box:
dd if=/dev/zero bs=XXX count=1k | dd of=/dev/null bs=32k
The idea would be, that possibly the client box has problems, when it has to
handle big data blocks inside the kernel (in that case part 1 would show the
same performance degradation as ur initial test).
-Arne
____________________________________________________________________________________
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Bad performance while transfer large block size through NFS.
- Next by Date: Re: Intel PRO/10GbE CX4? General 10Gb tips?
- Previous by thread: Re: Bad performance while transfer large block size through NFS.
- Next by thread: hd device names
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|