Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: NOC Meganet <tec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:06:05 -0300
On Thursday 14 June 2007 06:59:41 Thomas Vogt wrote:
Hi
Thats sounds nice. You wrote "The goal of the PmcTools project is to
provide FreeBSD's developers and system administrators with
non-intrusive, low-overhead and innovative ways of measuring and
analysing system performance" your website. Have you ever measured the
performance impact of such tools?
I'm interested to run such tool on production machines in the future but
only if the performance impact isn't that high.
Hi
... even if the tool (whatever it is) does not require much system resources
it triggers processes in order to measure their or the system's performance.
So long as you do not push the system to or over the edge you might not get
valuable numbers. So I mean, any performance measuring does or must stress
the system. That is at least my understanding. So probably running
performance tests on a production server is not the very best idea.
HM
--
Prowip Telecom Ltda
AS 22706
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Thomas Vogt
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- References:
- PAPI in the ports
- From: Harald Servat
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Thomas Vogt
- PAPI in the ports
- Prev by Date: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Next by Date: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Previous by thread: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Next by thread: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|