Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:03:17 +0400
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:27:01 +0200
Thomas Vogt <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> mentioned:
Yes you're right. But to have a such feature on a production system is
nice if you have to debug issues. If I get a problem I can easily debug
it without to simulate everything in the lab. It's not that I want to
run such features 24/7.
But perhaps "options HWPMC_HOOKS" in the kernel enables some hooks which
could cause performance penalties even if I don't actively use such
feature very often. Like many other debug options in the kernel. I don't
know.
I'm using "options HWPMC_HOOKS" on heavily loaded web server almost
constantly, no visible penalty at all. Just my 2 cents.
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
Attachment:
pgpBIOmRx5XyZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Harald Servat
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- References:
- PAPI in the ports
- From: Harald Servat
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Thomas Vogt
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: NOC Meganet
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Thomas Vogt
- PAPI in the ports
- Prev by Date: Re: wifi network performance with ath0 and hostapd
- Next by Date: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Previous by thread: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Next by thread: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|