Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: "Harald Servat" <redcrash@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:40:10 +0200
2007/6/22, Stanislav Sedov <stas@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 13:27:01 +0200
Thomas Vogt <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> mentioned:
>
> Yes you're right. But to have a such feature on a production system is
> nice if you have to debug issues. If I get a problem I can easily debug
> it without to simulate everything in the lab. It's not that I want to
> run such features 24/7.
>
> But perhaps "options HWPMC_HOOKS" in the kernel enables some hooks which
> could cause performance penalties even if I don't actively use such
> feature very often. Like many other debug options in the kernel. I don't
> know.
>
I'm using "options HWPMC_HOOKS" on heavily loaded web server almost
constantly, no visible penalty at all. Just my 2 cents.
Those are good news! :)
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Empty your memory,
with a free()...
like a pointer!
If you cast a pointer to an integer,
it becomes an integer,
if you cast a pointer to a struct,
it becomes a struct.
The pointer can crash...,
and can overflow.
Be a pointer my friend...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- PAPI in the ports
- From: Harald Servat
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Thomas Vogt
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: NOC Meganet
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Thomas Vogt
- Re: PAPI in the ports
- From: Stanislav Sedov
- PAPI in the ports
- Prev by Date: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Next by Date: Re: wifi network performance with ath0 and hostapd
- Previous by thread: Re: PAPI in the ports
- Next by thread: wifi network performance with ath0 and hostapd
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|