Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:33:19 +0200
Obviously if you can afford SCSI/SAS performance will likely be even
better. However make sure you can get management program for the
controller. At the very least some type of notification if the raid is
degraded.
We will probably go for SCSI. HP DL380 with "HP SmartArray", aka ciss.
This server is very solid and is fully supported by FreeBSD 6.2 and
7.0. We have one with 4 146 GB sas-disks in raid 1+0. Just make sure
you get at least 256 MB cache. The raid-management tool is very easy
to use.
--
regards
Claus
When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.
Shakespeare
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Francisco Reyes
- Re: AMD or Intel?
- From: Palle Girgensohn
- AMD or Intel?
- Prev by Date: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Next by Date: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Previous by thread: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Next by thread: Re: AMD or Intel?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
